Johan Zoffany: Colonel Blair with his Family and an Indian Ayah
Johan Zoffany, Colonel Blair with his Family, Tate Britain, London. |
Zoffany’s painting depicts Colonel Blair (commander of the British troops at Cawnpore in India), the Colonel’s wife, their elder daughter Jane, their younger daughter Maria, and an unnamed Indian girl who is probably an Ayah - a lady’s maid (Webster 525). This type of picture is called a “conversation piece”, a group portrait showing a family in a domestic interior, sometimes accompanied by friends or servants. The Blairs are elegantly dressed, sit upon fine chairs, and are waiting to hear their daughter Jane play the piano. It is as if they are trying to recreate the way of life they had back in England. English people in India often spent their evenings drinking tea, playing cards, and listening to music (Spear 56). The picture shows the Blair family at their very best, and yet it is also human and informal. The family do not seem to be posing for the benefit of the viewer. The Colonel looks at his wife, Mrs Blair looks at her daughter Jane, and only the young people are aware of the viewer. This creates the illusion that we are intruding upon a private moment. English families in India had large numbers of servants (Spear 51) and yet we are only shown one of them here, the Ayah. The two pets – the cat and the dog – also add to this mood of domestic informality.
The picture is very
concerned with family relationships and gender roles. Although it is a group
portrait, the faces of the sitters are not strongly individualised, perhaps because
the picture is primarily about their social roles. They are dutiful daughters
and loving parents. Marital portraits of the later eighteenth century celebrate
an “emotional relationship between husband and wife”, as Kate Retford has shown
(Retford 49). Colonel and Mrs Blair are holding hands, and Colonel Blair looks
lovingly towards his wife. Another example of marital affection would be
Gainsborough’s portrait of Mr and Mrs
Hallett, The Morning Walk (1785, National Gallery), in which the couple are
strolling arm-in-arm together. In eighteenth-century portraits of families, the
son and heir is usually shown on the right hand side of the father, while the
other children are grouped around the mother (Retford 129). This is basically the arrangement used by
Zoffany in his portrait of Colonel Blair and his family, except that it is
Blair’s elder daughter who is given the place of honour beside her father,
presumably because he had no son. The elder daughter, seated at the piano, is
slightly separated from the rest of the group to emphasise her importance, and
also to show that she is more adult than her younger sister, who seems more
interested in her pet cat and dog. Piano-playing was thought to be a suitable
pastime for a lady. The poses of the figures also offer clues to their expected
behaviour. The mother and elder daughter sit stiffly upright, the younger
daughter stands in a more relaxed pose, leaning against her mother’s chair, and
the Colonel adopts a “masculine” posture, with legs apart and a hand resting on
his thigh. The Ayah, who is from a different culture, clutches the cat and
wears no shoes.
The clothing worn by
the figures offers further clues to their social roles. The mother and elder
daughter wear fashionable and formal dresses, very impractical for a hot
country like India, while the younger daughter wears a looser gown and has her
hair unbound. Maria’s gown with its high waist anticipates the fashions of Jane
Austen’s time. The English ladies are fashionably pale in complexion, and do not
appear to have been tanned by the Indian sunshine. The Colonel wears a military
uniform, to remind us of his professional responsibilities outside the home. Interestingly,
the red, black and white of his uniform links him to the Ayah, who wears a red
shawl and holds a black and white cat. Perhaps this suggests that both of them
are outsiders, with a second life outside the domestic world depicted in the
picture. The beautiful costumes worn by all the figures are accentuated by the
grey and olive-green background, which helps to give an overall unity to the
picture.
The Blair family are
gathered to hear Jane play the piano, which is the main action of the picture.
This is a typical format for a “conversation piece”. As Mary Webster says, in
most conversation pieces “the sitters are linked to one another or to the whole
group by an action” (Webster 114). A
secondary action is created by Maria, the younger daughter, who has moved to
the other side of the picture to greet the Ayah, possibly to help her protect
the cat from the dog.
Another feature of a
typical “conversation piece” is the display of objects – furniture, porcelain,
clocks, mirrors, carpets, oil paintings, and the like – which are intended to
advertise the wealth and good taste of their owners. The Blairs have a fairly
modest collection of objects – some fine chairs, a piano, a mirror, and three
oil paintings – but these serve to demonstrate that they have brought a
cultured and English way of life with them to India. The presence of the Ayah
is the only obvious clue that we are in India, and this must have been one of
the reasons for the inclusion of the Ayah in the picture. However, the three
paintings on the wall at the back of the room, although in a European style,
are nevertheless scenes of life in India. The large painting in the middle
includes Indian buildings and an elephant, while the two paintings on either
side of it depict “wood being piled up in preparation for a suttee” - the
burning of a widow - and “the ceremony of Charak Puja or hook swinging” - hanging
from hooks to placate the goddess Kali (Webster 525). Why would the Blairs have
wanted pictures of such subjects? One possible explanation is that
they refer to the problems of governing India, the job Colonel Blair had been
sent to do. As Michael Hatt and Charlotte Klonk point out, Europeans liked to
emphasise any bad features of the countries they were conquering, because this
would “help to justify Western intervention in the East” (Hatt 229).
The three background paintings also serve
a compositional function, in that the bottoms of their frames form a long straight
line above the heads of the family – but not including the Ayah – helping to
unite the family into a group. The whole setting of the space in which the
Blairs are placed acts as a kind of stage set to display the family members. The
figures are strung out in a line, like actors on a stage, and the entrances on
either side are like the wings of a stage. The ante-room at the extreme right
of the picture even contains a large mirror, in which the family could have
prepared for their appearance. All this may be an influence from Zoffany’s past
experience, as he had specialised in painting scenes from plays, particularly
ones featuring the famous actor David Garrick. This would also suggest that
Zoffany is depicting an invented setting, not a room in the Blairs’ actual home,
especially as it does not look like a real space. We seem to be looking at an
interior, and yet the extreme left leads straight out into the garden, without
any intervening door. It is interesting that this probably imaginary setting
includes a column (on the left) and a bunched-up curtain (on the right). A
column adjacent to a curtain were stock properties of portraits in the grand
manner, intended to convey the sitter’s aristocratic status, seen for example
in Sir Joshua Reynolds’s portrait of Lady
Charlotte Hill, Countess Talbot (1781,
Tate Britain). Perhaps the column and the curtain were kept separate in the
portrait of the Blairs to prevent them from being accused of having ideas above
their station.
Comparison with
Sir Joshua Reynolds also serves to emphasise the old fashioned way in which
Zoffany was working. Reynolds and Gainsborough promoted bravura and painterly styles,
somewhat broad brush and indeterminate. For example, in Gainsborough’s portrait of Mr and Mrs Hallett we see two people in
motion, light breaking on the horizon, waving trees, contrasts of light and
shade, and subdued colours, all painted in a flickering, impressionistic
manner. By contrast, Zoffany’s picture has sharply defined outlines, bright and
clear colours, a symmetrical arrangement, and an abundance of details. The Blairs were probably quite conservative in
their tastes, and this kind of picture must have been exactly what they wanted.
The picture would act as a record to remind them of their time in India, and perhaps
to advertise their status to their friends and visitors. Also, as Hatt and
Klonk point out in a different context (Hatt 229), such a precise and “realistic”
style would have helped to persuade people that this was an accurate depiction
of the Blairs’ life in India.
Perhaps the most intriguing aspect of the
picture is the relationship between Maria and the Ayah, who appear to be of
similar ages. Although the Ayah would have been a servant, the picture presents
the two girls as companions, standing close together. Maria strokes the cat
while the Ayah holds it for her. We feel that Maria may be emotionally closer
to the Ayah than she is to her older sister Jane. There is an implied contrast
between the cultured, adult world represented by Jane at the piano and the
childish but livelier world represented by Maria, the Ayah and the cat. Cats
tend to feature in portraits of children, for example Hogarth’s portrait of The Graham Children (1742, National
Gallery) and Gainsborough’s The Painter’s
Daughters with a Cat (1760-1,
National Gallery). Without knowing more about the Blairs’ household, it is
impossible to know the exact status of the Ayah, and whether she was more than
just a servant. It is nice that she is included in the picture, although she
seems to have entered the room from outside, just a moment ago, which rather
suggests that she is not seen as being one of the family circle. But the
interaction between Maria and the Ayah is the most touching part of Zoffany’s
picture, and it is good that Maria was the one who eventually inherited the
picture (Webster 525)
Hatt, Michael and Charlotte Klonk, “Postcolonialism” in Art History: A Critical Introduction to its Methods, Manchester: Manchester UP, 2006, pages 223-239
Retford, Kate, The Art of Domestic Life: Family Portraiture in Eighteenth-century England, New Haven & London: Yale UP, 2006
Spear, Percival, The Nabobs: A Study of the Social Life of the English in Eighteenth-century India, London: Oxford UP, 1965
Webster, Mary, Johan Zoffany 1733-1810, New Haven & London: Yale UP, 2nd ed. 2011
Comments
Post a Comment